送交者: conner 于 2016-03-10, 13:54:42:

回答: 我只是说李应该像AG了解李一样了解AG不然就不对称了 由 conner 于 2016-03-10, 13:50:52:

• If Li makes different decisions than CAG and wins, then Li > AG (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2016-03-10, 14:53:46 (803276)
• if Li never makes different decisions than CAG, then Li is nothing VS AG (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2016-03-10, 14:52:32 (803275)
• if Li makes different decisions than CAG, and the games ties, then Li ~= AG (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2016-03-10, 14:51:01 (803272)
• 你这设计不对吧 - whoami (95 bytes) 2016-03-10, 14:23:05 (803261)
  • 说明有你没你都一样 (无内容) - conner (0 bytes) 2016-03-10, 14:29:21 (803262)
    • 如果李也一步不走呢？那不就永远也证明不了AG比李高了？所以说你的设计不对嘛 (无内容) - whoami (0 bytes) 2016-03-10, 14:52:32 (803274)

加跟贴