送交者: mangolasi 于 2005-3-22, 19:24:01:
回答: what? 由 skipper3 于 2005-3-22, 19:14:39:
That's true. Actually I am not very into what you are discussing.
But I am still worry. If the house's rent just cover the interest rather than the interest+principle, 50 years later, you are still have debt of that principle, and while your house worth something (the market price), this something is accumulated by your repayment of interest (i.e. how's the deal of not buying the house and rather, borrow money to invest in the stock market?).
Just no free lunch.